kumquat wrote:My first thought was vacuum leak. There are hoses you don't know about and won't see. You need to do a proper vacuum test. You can use a vacuum gauge (cheap ones at Harbor Freight), starter fluid, or you can do it right and have a mechanic do a smoke test. If your code reader has a real-time gauge you can look at the MAP data also, to give you an indication.
Neither have been done in the 2 years I've owned the car, Couldn't tell you if it had before. It seems to shift just as well as the previous vibe I had (17k miles and a year old when i got that one), so the trans hasn't been a focus, but couple probably stand a service anyway. I'm used to doing more than 90% of my repairs/maintenance myself and have no idea how much professional work costs, what's an average for the valve clearance check?jolt wrote:When was the last time you've checked the valve clearance or have had the AT serviced?
vibrologist wrote:Could be. But I don't think that is why EVAP appears last. It is probably just the sequence.
There are plenty of hoses that could cause a vacuum leak. I agree with kumquat that this sounds like a vacuum leak. There are some unusual places that are easy to overlook. I.e. if the seal under the oil cap is bad air can be sucked in and go through the PCV valve into the intake. If the membrane in the brake booster leaks air will move through the brake booster hose. What I am saying do not limit yourself to the immediate periphery of the intake, follow the hoses back as well.
There you go. In addition I suggest you check all the vacuum lines at their ends. If they are hardened replace them. Check the gasket at the tank lid as well.I'm going to order the proper fitted hoses and go from there, the original hoses were showing dry rot at the ends anyway.
I'm hunting thru parts sites and even Toyota/GM's sites and am having a hard time finding the specific hoses that go from the intake manifold to the purge valve and from that to the firewall, is there a good source and diagram of these somewhere? Otherwise, is there a specific hose size to do these myself? I purchased 3/8" fuel hose, but that seems big (but could be clamped down).vibrologist wrote:There you go. In addition I suggest you check all the vacuum lines at their ends. If they are hardened replace them. Check the gasket at the tank lid as well.I'm going to order the proper fitted hoses and go from there, the original hoses were showing dry rot at the ends anyway.
vibrologist wrote:If you still have the old plugs could you post a picture of the electrodes?
I hear you on the Dart. http://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside ... tal-mopar/
Not sure on the engine oil, maybe something clogged or wasn't moving enough for the higher rpm. Will drain and check.vibrologist wrote:You need to check transmission fluid level with the transmission warm, engine idling, parking on level ground. This fluid expands quite a bit and there is an overflow tank built into the transmission.
What happened to the engine oil?
vibrologist wrote:What kind of flush did you use?
I personally stay away from any solvent based flushing procedures because they can dislodge fairly large junks of deposits that may clog an oil passage.
Frequent oil changes are a more gentle way of cleaning out an engine.
I would change the oil again and cut up the oil filter to see if it contains large particles. I would consider looking for particles at the solenoid filter.
using a stethoscope (a length of garden hose) you may be able to track down the location of the noisy lifter. Briansmobile on Youtube shows how he fixed a stuck lifter in a GM truck using B12-chem tool. Maybe your situation is similar enough.
That's a problem with the manufacturer's fitment list, not Rock Auto. Rock Auto is 100% awesome. Be sure to let them and the manufacturer know about the incompatibility.noguice wrote:agreed.
Rockauto has not been too bad for most purchases, but even some of their items just don't work.
I bought this thru Amazon, it was the exact same item/part # on RockAuto and most other sites claiming it was for the base '05. It will screw in, but the connector doesn't match either location, upstream or down. Not having that chance to compare first hand just cost me time just trying to save a buck.
I actually bought it on Amazon, but yeah, it's the same part number as RA and other outlets, so I hold no beef with the sellers, just the manufacturer.kumquat wrote:That's a problem with the manufacturer's fitment list, not Rock Auto. Rock Auto is 100% awesome. Be sure to let them and the manufacturer know about the incompatibility.noguice wrote:agreed.
Rockauto has not been too bad for most purchases, but even some of their items just don't work.
I bought this thru Amazon, it was the exact same item/part # on RockAuto and most other sites claiming it was for the base '05. It will screw in, but the connector doesn't match either location, upstream or down. Not having that chance to compare first hand just cost me time just trying to save a buck.
lannvouivre wrote:Here are service manual con rod marks for bearings:
1: 1.486 to 1.490 mm
2: 1.491 to 1.494 mm
3: 1.495 to 1.498 mm
When I overhauled my engine, I only needed to use STD bearings for proper clearance. Interestingly, the locations of the marks vary depending on whether TAIHO or FEDERAL MOGUL/GLYCO made the bearings for Toyota. If you're wondering, TAIHO's marks are on the exterior by the locating claws (lot number by the edge, the size mark is above the lot number), and F-M/G is marked on the interior by the locating claws.
Additionally, I recommend you buy MAHLE/Clevite and not the other brands. MAHLE is an OEM manufacturer as well as a high-performance specialist. You can also shoot Monkeywrenchracing an email and ask about the stamping.