Ok for you, English speaking, here is my translated text:Recently, as I was looking for a new car, I considered the following (not in precise order) :Volvo S40 / V50 and perhaps V30.Ford Focus, 3 doors & wagon.Mazda 3 SportMazda 6 Sport (Hatchback).Pontiac Vibe and/or Matrix.Acura RSX.Audi A3 (3 doors).VW Golf (3 doors, GTI, I believed).Except for the Audi A3, the VW and the Acura RSX, I tried them all, for a 15 to 20 minutes road test, each.**********************************************************************I did like the Volvo S40 (turbo version), sound like a solid car, well shielded from exterior noise. But after reflection, I did not feel like spending CDN 30K+ (plus tax) for a car that required premium gas, has inferior reliability when compared to a Japanese car (reliability is probably improving, but not there yet). It is also the first year of production, Volvo are a bit weak in that respect. Parts & maintenance cost and the few dealership (where I lived, at least) had finally settled the case for that Volvo. If the Volvo V30 (3 doors) would had been available in spring 2005, maybe I would had stretch my previous car to reach it. On top of that, I had the impression (maybe false) of buying a glorify (read more expensive) Mazda3. But one day, I say to myself that I will buy a Volvo (when more models & engine (diesel and/or Hybrid) will be available), maybe when I retired, who knows ? because I give credit to Volvo for superior safety considerations (they do more than just passing the NHTSA crash test). Watch this if you are interested (go to deformations zones under):
http://www.newvolvos40.com/New...ang=2The Audi A3 (3 doors) will only be available in 2006, I believe, again I would had probably hesitate price wise, reliability wise and over the parts & maintenance costs, etc.The VW Golf (new Golf, that exist in Europe, but not available here for now) is not available in 3 doors version (unless you go for the GTI, big price hike for more power, ridiculous insurance cost, just to get the hatchback). Same comments applied over reliability, maintenance cost since VW & Audi shared their platforms.As far as the Focus is concerns, I first look at the 3 doors, before I taught of the wagon. I did enjoy the ride, good driving feeling (I prefer a three branch steering wheel, not a four branch like the Focus). I was disappointed that the North American Focus does not shared the new Volvo-Mazda platform as in Europe (it will, but only in 2007). But it was the long term reliability and the Ford name that made my back away.In the mean time, in my car research, I saw a Matrix in a Toyota dealership as I was also thinking about a Celica. I was pleased by the practical aspect of that car (flat cargo floor, ideal for a bike or two), 110 Volts plug & cellular jack in the central console, high driving position, etc. Then I realised that the Pontiac Vibe and the Matrix were brother & sister, basically the same car (but the option breakdown is more advantageous for the Vibe, roof rack, cladding, Std A/C, etc.).Then I tried a Mazda3 Sport, I realised why it was the car of the year for most people, nice car, sound driving experience, sophisticated, but I found myself badly seated, not the seat as such, but the very wide dash central console was pushing my knee outboard (maybe I’m out of proportion, but as I left the car, this was what I remembered the most). I also heard horror stories on Mazda parts prices. The only Mazda dealership near my house has a parking lot, so ridiculously small, that it is a nightmare to go to (if you leave your car unattended for 5 seconds, you are sure to have someone back into you). I did tried a Mazda6 when it was introduced (if this car, then, would had been a three doors hatchback, I would probably own one now), but let says that I was leaning toward any small wagon type vehicle.As far as the Acura RSX, it is a very nice & good vehicle (one of my friend have one and he is very please with it), but the required Boomerang (anti-car thief device required by most insurance), the added insurance cost, low sitting position and a trunk that could barely accommodate a bicycling (forget two). Finally I didn’t road test this car.At the end of the day, after I stomach the fact that I was about to buy an American car (just hope, nobody will laugh at me), a GM on top of that (I did promised myself, in the mid 80’s that I will never buy a GM again, after I had my 79 Caprice Caprice re-painted, (on my expense, of course), remember the faulty metal treatment on those, I opted for a Vibe 2005.There is also, all the %$$% !! damn car salesman (some idiotic saleswoman too) who could make you discard a brand all together (knew in some case, that they will never do business with me), and since I’m not about to go to the end of the world for another dealership, then this could lead up to car elimination real quick.All that to say, that buying a car (at least searching for one, when you don’t have an idea what you want in the first place, that was my case) is a complex process, not completely rational process, several factors plays into it (you could also surrender to boredom, exactly what the salesperson want you to).If someone would had told me, six months ago, that I would own a Vibe today, instead of an Honda or a Mazda or a Volvo, I would probably not had believe him. But so far, I’m please with my Vibe (I catch myself smiling while driving), but they are other good choices (I’m not sold to a brand that much, not fanatic, I means), I find my Vibe, so beautiful, with the Fusion colour, the mags (I first for me, I’m glad I did choose mags instead of steel wheel), I love driving it, (oh!, this is not a powerhouse, but I found it “fun†to drive, especially that small stick shift (almost like a joystick). Voilà , this is my story on car research.P.S. : Regardless, what you can think or say, there are lots of irrationals (read : based on emotion) factors that plays into any car purchase.