more turbo-charged engines?

Discussions about other vehicles other than the Vibe & Matrix.
Post Reply
redlava
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 9:46 am

more turbo-charged engines?

Post by redlava »

I read on one of the tickers at the bottom of the screen during this mornings news broadcast that the domestic auto makers are going to start offering smaller turbo-charged engines to help with the power versus fuel economy issue. It is about damn time!! I have been saying that for years now. A turbo-charged V6 instead of a V8 would have the same power, but get the fuel economy closer to a V6. Thanks a lot 10 minutes later.
NovaResource2
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:18 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (redlava)

Post by NovaResource2 »

While I agree, the reason you don't see more is realiability. You see, turbos are much harder on the engine oil and most people do not take care of their engines as they should.
Mavrik
Posts: 8072
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:41 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (NovaResource2)

Post by Mavrik »

Quote, originally posted by NovaResource2 »While I agree, the reason you don't see more is realiability. You see, turbos are much harder on the engine oil and most people do not take care of their engines as they should.From a service department employee, that last statement is sooo true.
2007 stage 2 Satin White Pearl Subaru STi 2008 stage 2 Subaru STi hatch See my car at: Mavrik's car page
drunkenmaxx
Posts: 6300
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 6:19 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (Mavrik)

Post by drunkenmaxx »

not to mention the higher octane gas you need...
chew aura pizza cheat main"the world in my hands, there's noone left to hear you scream, noone's there for you"
Stang2Vibe
Posts: 2689
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 3:37 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (redlava)

Post by Stang2Vibe »

The Big 3 switched some of their cars from larger displacement V8's to turbo 4's and 6's in the late 70's and early 80's. Most of them were a disaster. The Buick Grand National and GNX being glaring exceptions, of course!
Former owner of a 2003 Vibe GT---Great car that gave me 8 years and 83,000 miles of trouble-free service.Current owner of a 2008 Hyundai Santa Fe Limited AWD.
futseal04
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 5:25 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (redlava)

Post by futseal04 »

And don't forget the GMC Syclone/Typhoon...........
'04 Vibe Base'97 Buick Riviera S/C'01 Suzuki SV650S
Jahntassa
Posts: 2979
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 2:06 pm

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (Mavrik)

Post by Jahntassa »

Quote, originally posted by Mavrik »From a service department employee, that last statement is sooo true.They need to build all turbo cars with turbo-timers so the idiots who buy them don't shut off the car right away and freeze the bearings..I was under the impression that's why turbo's failed so much in the old days, the bearings would lock up too easily. (Don't take my word for that, though..only what I heard)
2003 Vibe GT Lava"He inched his way up the corridor as if he would rather be yarding his way down it.""For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen." - Douglas Adams...we all miss you
futseal04
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 5:25 am

Re: more turbo-charged engines? (Jahntassa)

Post by futseal04 »

I read somewhere that older turbos used the oil sumps for their oil supply, and if you didn't change the oil right (allow the turbo to get oil when you refilled or something like that), then when you started up the car, the turbo didn't have oil and burnt up. Also, motor oils were of a lesser quality, and a thing called "turbo coking" happened. THis is when the car wasn't idled for a short time (about a minute or so) before shutdown and allowed the oil to cake up on the inlet nozzle, effectively cutting off oil supply. Some units now have their own self-contained lubrication and don't have these problems.
'04 Vibe Base'97 Buick Riviera S/C'01 Suzuki SV650S
Post Reply