2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6

[MrRich]

Crossfire SRT-6 Performance Targets 0-60 mph under 5 seconds (coupe) low 5 seconds (roadster) 60-0 mph braking approximately 115 feet 0-100-0 mph under 16 seconds Top speed 158 mph (electronically limited) At-A-Glance Features Unique to the Crossfire SRT-6 -- 3.2-liter, 18-valve, supercharged SOHC engine, producing 330 horsepower (246 kW) and 310 lb.-ft. of torque (420 N-m) -- Performance-tuned exhaust -- Performance-tuned suspension, featuring increased spring rates versus base Crossfire (451 lb./in. front and 480 lb./in. rear for the Coupe; 434 lb./in. front and 451 lb./in. rear for the Roadster) -- Black, dual piston calipers front (44/44 mm) and rear (42/42 mm) -- Internally ventilated disc rotors front (330 x 32 mm) and rear (300 x 22 mm) -- Fixed rear spoiler -- Integrated chin spoiler -- SRT-6 badging on decklid and engine -- 15-spoke, lightweight SRT aluminum alloy wheels -- 200 mph (320 kph) instrument cluster -- Race-inspired seats, trimmed in Nappa Pearl Leather with Preferred Suede inserts and bolsters; SRT-6 embroidered on headrest I think it looks much better with the big spoiler on the back.

[Fialchar]

Wow, now that's a nice improvement on the Crossfire

[Mr.D]

The SRT is basically the outgoing Mercedes SLK32 platform and engine, I think it'll be an incredible bargain at +/- $40k. MrRich, where'd you get that little link that gives a person's IP and provider info? That's pretty cool

[MrRich]

Quote, originally posted by Mr.D » MrRich, where'd you get that little link that gives a person's IP and provider info? That's pretty cool

[Fialchar]

It looks like the danasoft one.

[JustinVGT]

Looks nice and I like the performance.

[noginsk]

Quote, originally posted by silverawd26 »Reminds me of the Gay Ambigious Duo car.LOL!

[Fformula88]

This car in the coupe form is just wierd. It looks really good from certain angles, and really bad from others. But the deal breaker on it is the cabin? Anyone tried to sit in one of these things? What a pain!It has unusually high side sills, remeniscent of a C4 Corvette. Except this car is more difficult to get in. For whatever reason,it felt to me like the door opening was too far towards the back of the car, making it difficult to sit down and then swign your legs over that high sill and then up and into the foot well. Once inside, it is very small and cramped. For whatever reason, it seems a lot worse than an SLK roadster to me. I am sure the SRT-6 goes like stink, but its way too cramped interior just stinks. Its so annoying as to ruin the whole car. I am also not that big either, 6 foot and in good shape. So I cannot imagine large Americans even being able to climb behind the wheel.

[Fialchar]

Notice he said large "Americans" and not large "people", I guess we're all just obese *******s. Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go steal a cop's jelly doughnuts.

[Fformula88]

Quote, originally posted by Fialchar »Notice he said large "Americans" and not large "people", I guess we're all just obese *******s. Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go steal a cop's jelly doughnuts. Not sensitive are we?Americans by and large are obese. Very obese. There is a growing concern that it is reaching epidemic levels and could cause serious problems. Its been in papers and on the news quite a bit lately. Children who can no longer bend over to pick up a toy off the floor they are so overweight. Besides, I didn't say fat or obese because I was not referring just to weight challenged people. Someone who is 6'4" will simply not fit in this car, whether they resemble a bean poll or a beach ball.

[Fialchar]

Not sensitive at all, that's why I said I was gonna go steal a jelly doughnut and winked. Americans are the most obese people in the world, which is kinda sad that people won't get off their lazy bums and work out or at least eat healthy. I take care of my body, and I stay in shape, so I've nothing to worry about.

[NSimkins]

We're a little off topic here. Keep the hostility down and continue with the original line of discussion.

[Fialchar]

Silver, my post wasn't even a reply to you, it was to Fformula88. You misunderstood a few things, I'll IM you rather than being off-topic.I'm not sure what the difference between the times is, but weight can play a major factor. That's why a lot of people (My brother included) pull out their backseats, and some even pull out the passenger seat upfront. Anyone know offhand the times of the roadster and the coupe? 1/4 mile or 0-60?

[Fformula88]

Oops! Sorry, didn't mean to inadvertently get a flame going here! I misunderstood Falchar, sorry!As for the car, I would certainly take a convertable over the coupe anyday. The rounded back end of the coupe just doesn't look right with the angular front end, but I think it looks really good as a convertable.