Winners and Losers - 2008

Discussions about other vehicles other than the Vibe & Matrix.
Post Reply
jake75
Posts: 4792
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 1:33 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Winners and Losers - 2008

Post by jake75 »

And so long as there are still recounts underway from the November elections, I would like to retroactively change my vote for the 2002 Car of the Year. It rightfully goes to the 2009 Pontiac G8. Yes, General Motors is late to the party again, but consider buying one of these anachronistic V-8 gas guzzlers, because if the company needs more bailout money, your tax dollars will be paying for one anyway.Full article - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12...?_r=1
2009 Vibe 1.8L Carbon Gray AT Power Pkg 1/12/092003 Vibe 1.8L Neptune AT Mono Power Pkg 1/27/03 [sold 2/2/09]2007 T&C SWB 7/31/07 "Broke people stay broke by living like they're rich. Rich people stay rich by living like they're broke."
ramenboy...
Posts: 2739
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:50 am
Location: Chicago il

Re: Winners and Losers - 2008 (jake75)

Post by ramenboy... »

hmmm... pretty interesting... lets see... chrysler sebring. the big loser. +1bmw 1 series... worst premium sports car. +1 makes sense. why charge about the same price for a 1 that you charge for a 3 series? i don't agree at all w/what he said about the g8 though. all the critics talk about how tight a car it is and how it basically spanks the bmw 5 series for a fracction of the price, and he calls it the worst large car? then he turns around and says the 5 is the best premium-class car? i don't get it.
Image
de-badged o4 vibe
tein s-techs | 17" msr 105 wheels | 235 45 17 nexen n7000
weapon-r short ram (thanx BC!) | typeR sport pedals | LED 3rd brake
o2 triumph speed four
Neouka
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:21 am

Post by Neouka »

A bit contradictory at times, but he lost all credibility when he said he liked the Mini Clubman. That thing is an utter travesty. No thanks.
03 Abyss Base, not 5 .. 6spd!2012 Focus soon...
shemp
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:14 pm

Re: Winners and Losers - 2008 (jake75)

Post by shemp »

I struggle to think of a less credible source for automotive information than the New York Times. This guy is clearly speaking to an audience that knows little about cars. From what I read, this article is pretty much based on the authors personal preference with little regard to empirical information. The BMW 1-Series for example... he says "how can you charge a 3-Series price for a car that is less, in every way?" ... by "3-series price" he must mean "1998 3-series price." There is approximately $5000 difference between comparably equipped 1 and 3 series. Furthermore, the 1 series is smaller than the 3, that's true, but it outperforms it's bigger brother in almost every measurable way. Rubbish I say.
2009 Vibe GT
KNINE
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:52 am
Location: Suffolk, Va.

Re: Winners and Losers - 2008 (shemp)

Post by KNINE »

Quote, originally posted by shemp »I struggle to think of a less credible source for automotive information than the New York Times. I would say that goes for all information.
"Don't look to the government to solve your problems, the government is the problem." Ronald Reagan"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin.
Post Reply