R. Kelly and Michael Jackson

[Charlievibe]

Okay, first, read this article: http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBI....html Okay, now explain to me why R. Kelly and MJ would have to stay away from each other. I know they are both in trouble for molesting children. However, neither of them are kids. I am confused....or maybe I am just naive. Did I miss the obvious in the article?

[VibeChick]

Don't know, maybe somebody on here has a legal background?

[wicked1981]

Seems weird. Maybe 2 perverts are better than 1 so stay apart? Dont know this one.

[scherry2]

Quote, originally posted by Charlievibe »Okay, first, read this article: http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBI....html Okay, now explain to me why R. Kelly and MJ would have to stay away from each other. I know they are both in trouble for molesting children. However, neither of them are kids. I am confused....or maybe I am just naive. Did I miss the obvious in the article?I would think that since kelly produced 2 of his songs someone thinks they might be in cahoots, buddies, ect... and they don't want them talking to each other (to compare notes) just for the reason stated, they are both under investigation for child molestation

[Merzbow]

I think that's a good idea. "hey Micheal, you want me to sleep over tonight and we can make a bon-fire and talk about some "experiences" we've had?"I personally think they should both be asassinated(spelling?)

[FusionVGT]

Why?

[Merzbow]

What do you mean why??? They molest little kids...anyone that does that when they are older than the kid doesn't belong in this world...or atleast in this country. That's just disgusting.

[FusionVGT]

They are alledged to have mollested kids. I am from Chicago, and it sickens my how Kelly was just let off the hook by law enforcement there. I don't think he should be killed, but he should get life. I know people who have seen the tape (I haven't - THAT'S disgusting) and they say you can clearly see it's Kelly. I've joking said they should make the SOB build the prison, then lock him up in it. The death penalty is for killers, and no one has charged him with murder.Michael Jackson is just a sick ba$tard that should have been comitted years ago before any of this happened, if in fact it did. You have to ask yourself what kind of parents would leave their kid with an alledged child mollester. If he did do it, prove it and lock him up for life. If he didn't do it, order him to an institution and figure out what's wrong with him. Again, the death penalty doesn't apply.Overall I have no pity for either one of them because even if innocent (BIG IF), they shouldn't have put themselves in these positions.

[Merzbow]

Yes, good idea, make him build it, well atleast make him pau for it because if he build it he would probably incoperate an escape route unless he was an idiot. I don't understand why alot of blacks still support micheal jackson...changing his skin color would be like an insult to me if I were black...I know he had a disease but still...deal with it.

[drunkenmaxx]

the disease is totally irrelevant, he changed his nose to be white, his chin is different, its clear he was going for a femanine white look! however crazy it may seem, it is definitely possible that michael really is innocent and just loves children. if a dad sleeps in the bed w/his son, is that a crime or f'ed up? not really. how do you prove beyond reason that he is guilty of wrong doing? chances are, he is though, sick mofo.