There's a linktoward the bottom of viewtopic.php?f=28&t=40113" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; to a pdf matrix service manual that includes wiring diagrams, applies to your 04 vibe as well, should prove useful,NateStraight wrote:No, I don't have any schematics / wiring diagrams. That would be helpful.
Was this with the relay in place?NateStraight wrote:I get about 8.5v across the 1st and 2nd contacts of the starter relay when I try to turn the key.
I haven't found in the instructions where it talks about this test, but I think it should be with the relay in place. It tests whether there is adequate current to activate the relay. Without the relay in place I don't see why this shouldn't be the full battery voltage. There may be a partial short to ground or damaged wire or contact somewhere in the circuit.NateStraight wrote:That was with the relay out.
I believe that's pretty typical after the ECU resets due to power loss (disconnecting battery long enough). It will "relearn" as you drive.NateStraight wrote:Ran it around the block; it is running a little rough, and idling lower than it normally does.
Great. I've kept it idling for awhile now in the drive and am about to go take it up to highway speed for a bit.Rayven01 wrote:I believe that's pretty typical after the ECU resets due to power loss (disconnecting battery long enough). It will "relearn" as you drive.NateStraight wrote:Ran it around the block; it is running a little rough, and idling lower than it normally does.
I'm pretty sure you found the problem here: the ignition switch. Jumpering IG4 and IG5 should make the car behave like the key has been turned to "start." The contacts in the switch are probably burned and have too much resistance to hold the ignition relay in.NateStraight wrote:Hot mama!
Put a bare wire jumper between IG4 and IG5; car tried to crank as soon as I put the negative battery cable back on [weird; key was not in].
Didn't do anything with the jumper in with the key; BUT, after I removed the jumper, I gave it a few quick tries... first time it turned over three or four times; second attempt... it works!
That's what we thought a second ago, so we re-tested; we pulled the connector to the ignition switch to bypass it entirely, jumped across IG4 and IG5 again, but it displayed the same one-crank symptom we've had all along. That should indicate the ignition switch is not the problem, yes? Or am I just making myself confused? When the car actually started, it was connected entirely "spec"; no jumpers or extra voltage anywhere.JohnO wrote:I'm pretty sure you found the problem here: the ignition switch. Jumpering IG4 and IG5 should make the car behave like the key has been turned to "start." The contacts in the switch are probably burned and have too much resistance to hold the ignition relay in.NateStraight wrote:Hot mama!
Put a bare wire jumper between IG4 and IG5; car tried to crank as soon as I put the negative battery cable back on [weird; key was not in].
Didn't do anything with the jumper in with the key; BUT, after I removed the jumper, I gave it a few quick tries... first time it turned over three or four times; second attempt... it works!
OK. So it isn't the ignition switch.NateStraight wrote: That's what we thought a second ago, so we re-tested; we pulled the connector to the ignition switch to bypass it entirely, jumped across IG4 and IG5 again, but it displayed the same one-crank symptom we've had all along. That should indicate the ignition switch is not the problem, yes? Or am I just making myself confused? When the car actually started, it was connected entirely "spec"; no jumpers or extra voltage anywhere.
Could the IG1 relay be something to try? I see it in the system on one wiring diagram I have, but not in another.
The thought had occurred to me. Kind of "Nascar" style. But you need to be careful since there won't be a park/neutral lock-out unless you wire through that as well.NateStraight wrote:Any harm in just setting up a jerry-rigged "push to start" button that supplies 12v directly to the starter relay on its own or some such?
Actually, come to think of it that could be why the ECU needs to know the state of the P/N switch. I believe that the rear window switch is locked out while the car is moving. You could try it out.NateStraight wrote: But, it does seem like there wouldn't be anything to keep someone from accidentally hitting the switch while the car was on the road.
I assume the outcome of that would be no good?