what? a chrystler???

drunkenmaxx · Post by **drunkenmaxx** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:03 am

damn. http://autoshow.msn.com/as/aut...w2004

russ257 · Post by **russ257** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:25 am

that is an awsome car

drunkenmaxx · Post by **drunkenmaxx** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:30 am

kind of ferrari-esqe body shape, huh?0-60 in 2.9 sec = balls to the wall!

pwarren4 · Post by **pwarren4** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:34 am

I would venture to say that Daimler-Chrysler has one of the best design / engineering teams in the world.In other words - they can draw very pretty pictures.But their execution / build teams just plain suck

ragingfish · Post by **ragingfish** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:36 am

I think I'm the only one who things even their concept designs are fugly.I've NEVER seen a chrysler I liked the looks of.

Reynoma · Post by **Reynoma** » Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:04 pm

Quote, originally posted by ragingfish »I think I'm the only one who things even their concept designs are fugly.I've NEVER seen a chrysler I liked the looks of.I have to disagree....I really like most of the Chrysler designs (for a minivan kind of guy like me, the Pacifica is pretty sleek). However, their build quality leaves much to be desired. That alone would keep me away from them.

what? a chrystler???

what? a chrystler???

Re: what? a chrystler??? (Salsa!)

Re: what? a chrystler??? (russ257)

Re: what? a chrystler??? (drunkenvibe)

Re: what? a chrystler??? (pwarren4)

Re: what? a chrystler??? (ragingfish)