Page 1 of 1
Undergarment preference
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:54 pm
by Reynoma
I was talking with some of my brothers (we are ages 52, 43 & 35). When growing up, our only choice was briefs as underwear - I say this only because that is what my mother bought. Growing up, we never strayed from that. Now, when we continued this conversation with my nephews, it seems that the preference with this younger generation (25, 23, 21, 20) is for boxers. So, is this a generation thing? What is the preferred style?(Women, feel free to give your opinion on what you like better, but I realize that you really don't have as much of a style choice as guys)
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:12 pm
by AKLGT
what are you talking about? we have so many choices, it's insane! do you want high cut briefs or low french style? full back or bikini? and then you have thongs.... g-string style or the traditional thicker band? sheesh! too many choices! lol
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:28 pm
by Reynoma
Ok, I stand corrected. I wasn't thinking like that. I was thinking more of a "loose fit" vs "support".
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:34 pm
by Mavrik
boxers, very comfortable
Re: Undergarment preference (Mavrik)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:38 pm
by drunkenmaxx
growing up, i wore briefs, like you said, that is what my mother bought. then, in jr high, it was kind of emberassing to change and have your whity tities expossed to the world, so i started with briefs and boxers, then fully converted to only boxers. much more cumfy! let the big guy breathe!
Re: Undergarment preference (Mavrik)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:40 pm
by futseal04
All commando, all the time. I got out of wearing it when I went through training......getting in and out of the water all the time made anything ride where it wasn't supposed to, plus you get massive chafing. And chafing+sand+salt water= really bad day.
Re: Undergarment preference (Mavrik)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:45 pm
by AKLGT
ha ha ha! those would be boxer briefs my love.
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:47 pm
by AKLGT
where's carrie and her infamous shirt? "girl with no panties most popular"(removed)!
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:56 pm
by Reynoma
Now-a-days I go between boxer briefs (preferred) and briefs. Boxers are just for bed time.
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:14 am
by wicked1981
Boxers all the way!
Re: Undergarment preference (wicked1981)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:19 am
by VibeChick
I can see how boxers would be more comfortable, but man those boxer briefs are waaaay sexier
Re: Undergarment preference (VibeChick)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:21 am
by AKLGT
Quote, originally posted by VibeChick »I can see how boxers would be more comfortable, but man those boxer briefs are waaaay sexier although, i kinda like tighty whiteys too in a wierd kinda way. lol.... just think of tom cruise in that movie, "all the right moves" sliding across the floor in his socks, shirt, and tighty whiteys! ha ha ha!
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:24 am
by drunkenmaxx
i thought that was "risky business"
Re: Undergarment preference (drunkenvibe)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:26 am
by VibeChick
Quote, originally posted by drunkenvibe »i thought that was "risky business"Aww, is it a fond memory for you too Drunken?
Re: Undergarment preference (VibeChick)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:37 am
by drunkenmaxx
Quote, originally posted by VibeChick »Aww, is it a fond memory for you too Drunken? yep, i want tom cruise's man juice! nah, its just a good movie that i have seen a lot. (rebecca demournays privates!)
Re: Undergarment preference (drunkenvibe)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:02 am
by AKLGT
oh ya! you're right! oops! wrong movie! either way, it was still a cruise movie
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:16 am
by Charlievibe
Quote, originally posted by trdvibe »just think of tom cruise sliding across the floor in his socks, shirt, and tighty whiteys! And what a wonderful image to carry with me the rest of the day...I LOVE that scene.My prefs for guys are boxers and briefs.
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 1:35 am
by ToolGuy
Quote, originally posted by Reynoma »Now-a-days I go between boxer briefs (preferred) and briefs. Boxers are just for bed time.Me too! The boys need support at the office, cannot have my junk moving around!
Re: Undergarment preference (MiVibe-ToolGuy)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:57 am
by Psychobroker
Boxers and sometimes boxer briefs
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:41 am
by Mr. Poopypants
I wore briefs as a young kid, then boxers, and about 2 years ago, I switched to boxerbriefs, it really is the best of both worlds. It isn't easy to explain, but those who wear boxerbriefs know what I mean.
Re: Undergarment preference (Mr. Poopypants)
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:40 am
by russ257
boxerbriefs
Re: Undergarment preference (russ257)
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 8:01 am
by redlava
Boxers all the way. I usta wear briefs when I was a kid, but switched to boxers when I got into high school. Much more comfortable.
Re: Undergarment preference (redlava)
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:45 am
by Viben' round
mmmm Boxer briefs, nothing like haven the Kibbles and Bits all supported and kept cozy in a soft cotton hammock. Nd then there are those night when you have to go out to the club and ditch the undies for that comando feeling. It's just a sexy feeling.
Re: Undergarment preference (Viben' round)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:04 am
by Merzbow
I'm with Drunken...Briefs til middle school, then boxers when changing for gym was required. The first time I switch was when I went to a high schooler's grad party with girls. I didn't wanna be wearing briefs incase something exciting happened (removed). I dunno what I thought was gonna happen since I was only like 11 or 12
Re: Undergarment preference (Merzbow)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 2:39 pm
by AKLGT
i have never worn briefs or boxers. well, maybe boxers but that was to wear bed as sleepwear or for gym shorts (allows you more air ). us ladies get very different options for undergarments! we have thongs, bikinis, high cut briefs (i think that's what they call them), sting bikinis (ouch), boy cut shorts (these are very strange to me), and many other "new" cuts or styles. i myself prefer the low cut bikini (so it doesn't ride up over the top of my pants and look stupid) or thong (depending on what pants i wear so you don't see a goofy panty line). so my question is do guys have to put as much thought into what underwear they will choose based on their clothing too?
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 8:32 pm
by Reynoma
For me, not really. I wear boxer-briefs as a general rule, unless I am wearing shorts that are not very long, then I wear briefs, just so the boxer-briefs are not hanging out the bottom.There are a couple of you who have preferred to "go commando". Isn't this a little uncomfortable in jeans? I mean, slim could get caught on the zipper.
Re: Undergarment preference
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:17 pm
by Stang2Vibe
LOL, just when you think you've seen it all on GenVibe! For me it was briefs as a kid, now I'm all boxers. Never tried boxerbriefs. Maybe some day if I feel like something different, who knows. Why am I even answering this? lol.
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:19 pm
by Stang2Vibe
Quote, originally posted by Reynoma »For me, not really. I wear boxer-briefs as a general rule, unless I am wearing shorts that are not very long, then I wear briefs, just so the boxer-briefs are not hanging out the bottom. (removed)!!! Guys should NEVER wear shorts that are so short that boxerbriefs would hang out the bottom!!! Oh yucky!!!
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:13 pm
by AKLGT
Quote, originally posted by Reynoma »There are a couple of you who have preferred to "go commando". Isn't this a little uncomfortable in jeans? I mean, slim could get caught on the zipper.my bro goes commando and is quite proud of it. he wears button fly for this very reason!
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:23 pm
by Kari
I'm a bikini kind of girl, too. I own some thongs, but just for dress pants and stuff that really need it, because I don't think they're comfortable enough for everyday wear. I'm with the ouch on the string *anything*...heh. I like boycut shorts on a bathing suit, but not as underwear.
Re: Undergarment preference (Salsa!)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:35 pm
by AKLGT
NOT on large people.... ha ha ha! my best friend and i shared a hotel room in vegas a few years back. i used to only wear thongs so i'd drop my pants and yell, "i'm mooning you! but not!" i think after about the 3rd time, she threw something (perhaps a shoe) and hit me in the head! LOL
Re: Undergarment preference (Salsa!)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:39 pm
by AKLGT
where are my eye muffs! aaaagh!!!!!! my eyes! they are burning!!!!
Re: Undergarment preference (Salsa!)
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:49 pm
by Kari
(removed) how gross...someone should pay her to put her clothes back ON.
Re: Undergarment preference (Salsa!)
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:13 am
by kostby
I see you found the 'Overeaters Anonymous' poster child, Salsa!EWWWWW!
Re: Undergarment preference (Reynoma)
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 3:44 am
by futseal04
Quote, originally posted by Reynoma »There are a couple of you who have preferred to "go commando". Isn't this a little uncomfortable in jeans? I mean, slim could get caught on the zipper.I tell you....Big Jim and the Twins have NEVER been caught in the zipper, but I'd be willing to bet that if anyone ever got that way, he would only do it once......"How'd you get the beans above the Frank?"And as far as comfort things don't rub like you would think. It just feels good to be liberated and free and unconstricted.
Re: Undergarment preference (futseal04)
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 4:20 am
by AKLGT
Quote, originally posted by futseal04 »I tell you....Big Jim and the Twins have NEVER been caught in the zipper, but I'd be willing to bet that if anyone ever got that way, he would only do it once......"How'd you get the beans above the Frank?"And as far as comfort things don't rub like you would think. It just feels good to be liberated and free and unconstricted.(removed)! that image totally came to my mind! but i suppose it would be the same as women going bra-less... free the twins! free the twins! ha ha ha! women's lib unite!
Re: Undergarment preference (trdvibe)
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 5:54 am
by Merzbow
(removed), you all are crazy.
Re: Undergarment preference (Merzbow)
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:26 am
by Viben' round
There is nothing crazy about liberating the Kibbles and Bits. as stated earlier it is just a nice feeling. And I too have never niped my Hoo Hoo Dilly on the zipper. DO NOT WANT TO RE-ENACT THAT SCENE FROM "THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT MARRY"!!!