tpollauf wrote:By any chance did you take some photos (especially close-up ones) of this damage? If so post them here so us GenVibe experts (not me ..) can futhere asses the damage and offer you suggestions.....Get us some proof of this unfortunate accident and keep us all posted here. Thanks

LOL sounds kind of ominous, doesn't it?

I have pictures of the damage, but unfortunately a strut wouldn't show up especially well in pictures, would it? Nor would other involved mechanical problems....
The paint discrepancy is subtle: can only really see it on sunny days, and fortunately for my tendency to get really angry about unintentional mismatched car paint, around here, those days only come around 4-5 days per year thanks to the parallel and crappy air quality... The adjustor actually told me it looks fine, but I had two other people comment to me about it not matching post accident, without me bringing it up, one of whom does custom paint jobs and wraps for a living, and we've since viewed it in multiple situations, to discount any reflection from trees, etc. Definitely a twinge of green. Almost like they didn't clean their equipment properly before spraying that little piece.
I can take pics of driver's strut vs the passenger's side, as that seems more relevant than the body damage to the topic at hand. It looks less like "who the f--- took a backhoe to my car" and more along the lines of lots and lots of subtle things. Bumper and skirting had to be replaced, wheel had to be replaced, tire had to be replaced, wheel well guard had to be replaced. Headlight assembly had to be replaced. Mirror was completely ripped off and had to be replaced. Quarter panels had to be straightened/replaced and repainted, driver's door had to be remounted as it was catching in the bottom corner by the wheel well. Skirting around the wheel well and along the runner had to be replaced.....all and all the insurance company was charged close to $3800 to repair what they did, which wasn't everything it needed. No documentation stating that they even looked beyond the cosmetic, beyond a tire balance and alignment. And some of the silicone stripping along the edge of the new skirting is beginning to peel, too. If I had to choose, I'd rather have some of the dents back if it meant the suspension could have gotten an honest and documented look. But, considering I have full coverage insurance and NO prior accidents or moving violations EVER (I'm 28, and have been driving since I was 16, so statistically speaking, I'm about as minimal an insurance risk as a company could have), I should NOT have to choose between my car looking pre-accident and driving pre-accident. What complicates things is that this was fixed back in late march/early april, but I was extremely ill from days after I got the car back to Mid-May. I've only been driving post-repair work for about 3-4 months, and even then not much until recently. That's also why I haven't gotten to ask about all the stuff I want to do to this car: I lost my job from being sick, and all the money for the car's awesomefication went to bills. So I didn't exactly want to get back into it. I want to, in a perfect world, get way nicer and slightly larger rims: in black, put a body kit and vented hood on it, paint it a dark rich purple, improve the tuning and/or put a turbo on it, do some custom interior and exterior lighting, etc, in no particular order. Now I'm more worried about getting it back to OEM standards. One step at a time.
I feel as though there should be an extra thread on here regarding illogical, stupid, or sexist things mechanics and/or adjustors have told people whose cars are victims of yet more people's stupidity. Idiotic and/or sexist things I've been told by the adjustors (plural!) so far regarding this include, "it's not that bad" (not in the sense that it was totaled, but considering it hasn't driven correctly since, I'd say I have a horse in this race...), "it was out of toe when you brought it in, so...." (yes, probably in no small part because it was, ahem, hit right in the wheel......gah), "cars probably aren't [my] thing, so
should probably trust the guys here at the service center" (cars are my thing, specifically my favorite hobby- they really, really are, and considering the next ball of stupid gushed forth from their mouths, this one really made me angry), and "the struts are an internal part of the suspension, so it is *highly unlikely* that the strut would be damaged in an accident that affected the wheel. They're pretty deep in there so a lot of other parts would be damaged, too" ([twitch].....1) they're not internal: if they were anymore external they wouldn't be attached 2) they absolutely can be, ESPECIALLY because of the direct involvement of the wheel itself, 3) there probably ARE other things wrong, seeing as it sounds like a sack of quarters is tacked to the well every time I go over even a SLIGHT bump and 4) shut up, fool, and where is an adult with even a little car knowledge I can speak to?!?........[all the expletives, ever]
)
Seeing as the shop in question didn't document suspension damage nor did they document a lack thereof, this is going to devolve into a game of he said/she said rather quickly, in this case the "she" will probably become a factor not in my favor in court, if it comes to that, thanks to those sweet, sweet stereotypes..... Seriously, replacing a strut is cheaper for them in terms of money and reputation than a lawsuit, but I've already got two impartial mechanics, as well as my usual one, lined up to perform a diagnostic estimate this week. Also, I'm Irish, so letting things go isn't exactly my forte, and I'm 100% FINE with that. Game. on.