Page 1 of 1
.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:36 am
by micheles_bad_vibe
.
Re: which is worse? (silverawd26)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:00 am
by msmyer
I don't know that i've seen one!?
Re: which is worse? (silverawd26)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:17 am
by red
i second your opinion, silverawd!! and auto writers BASH gm for cladding issues!! this subie looks like they coated it in glue and ran it thru the cladding pit....jeez!!
Re: which is worse? (red)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:29 am
by Geo
Oh c'mon! The Baja is awesome!Again, this is another vehicle that I almost got instead of the Vibe. I needed the room, but just not fast enough for me, plus the Vibe looked cooler :DAlthough, next to VW, Subaru is my next fav car maker
Re: which is worse? (micheles_bad_vibe)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 11:24 am
by huy397
Suby Baja.IMO, Nissan Murano and Infiniti FX45 are great looking cars... good cars too.
Re: which is worse? (msmyer)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:28 pm
by ragingfish
quote:I don't know that i've seen one!?Here...cover your eyes, ugliness has entered...
Re: which is worse? (huy397)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:34 pm
by ragingfish
quote:IMO, Nissan Murano and Infiniti FX45 are great looking cars... good cars too. Those two are most definitely sharp looking cars. The Murano is definitely a head turner as it goes by...Though I'd buy a Lexus before an Infiniti...I think the RX330 is pretty sharp looking...Interestingly enough, I still find myself watching Vibes as they pass by...
Re: which is worse? (ragingfish)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:41 pm
by fire_502
there is this Murano that I see on M59 occasionally. It's orange and maybe just a shade darker than the Vibe orange...if not the same. Certainly unique. I kind of like it though.
Re: which is worse? (fire_502)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:42 pm
by ragingfish
I saw the inside of a Murano at the NY Auto Show...extremely unappealing...too much orange, and (removed), I HATE leather interiors!!!
Re: which is worse? (micheles_bad_vibe)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:26 pm
by Triton
Man, that's a tough one. The Subaru Baja looks like a butchered El Camino but the Honda Element looks like a shoe box on wheels. I voted for the Baja.
Re: which is worse? (Triton GT)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:22 pm
by slbpsi63
Who put the Murano and FX45 on that list? They are awesome looking vehicles and you put them on a list with a cladded box and a legacy missing half a roof? Gees.
Re: which is worse? (slbpsi63)
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:35 pm
by cibomatto
NONONONO... the UGLIEST... car ever made (IMO) is the Suzuki Aerio
Re: which is worse? (cibomatto)
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 6:17 am
by Chris
I think I'm going to puke... the Aztec monstrosity is actully rated higher than the Baja????I mean, c'mon! The aztec is a hideous piece (tiny wheels, too much plastic and... how many grills/openings can you get on one vehicle?) whilst the baja, while not in the running for any beauty contests, at least is proportional and has some 'stance'. The aztec? Oh man that thing defines hidious. I'd suggestAztec by a long shotAerioBajaElementThe rest are kinda cool...'Course, this is just my opinion
Re: which is worse? (cibomatto)
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 6:40 am
by Shadow Realm
I agree with you cibomatto! The aerio is the ugliest vehicle in the above mentioned list. At least the Baja has some functionality where as the Aerio serves no purpose at all to me.Shadow Realm
Re: which is worse? (Shadow Realm)
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:00 am
by ragingfish
quote:the Aerio serves no purpose at all to me.Of course it does! It gives us something to make fun of!
Re: which is worse? (ragingfish)
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 9:29 am
by micheles_bad_vibe
.
Re: which is worse? (ragingfish)
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 10:36 am
by MrRich
quote:IMO, Nissan Murano and Infiniti FX45 are great looking cars... good cars too. Those two are most definitely sharp looking cars. The Murano is definitely a head turner as it goes by... by...100% agree!!!Murano next car. FX45 dream car.
Re: which is worse? (MrRich)
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 11:06 am
by russ257
man if i was rich i would have gotten the infinity instead of my vibe well actually if i was rich i would own several cars one for each purpose an SUV, a sports car, a luxury car, another sports car well you get the idea
Re: which is worse? (russ257)
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 8:06 am
by Psychobroker
quote:I think the RX330 is pretty sharp lookingIf you like a spiced up Highlander I voted for the Element, but the Baja in two tone makes me want to puke my lunch. Aztek's also horrible and should be creamated.
Re: which is worse? (Psychobroker)
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 1:48 pm
by fuel4soul
I like Azteks, Bajas, and Elements. I have weird taste but hey, Someone has to like them or the new futuristic daredevils they come out with will fail and they will keep making bland old cars over and over. We need change in the auto world whether old fashioned people like it or not. Just imagine what your children, grandchildren, or even great grandchildren will be driving!
Re: which is worse? (fuel4soul)
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 3:53 pm
by kaybeejay
The Murano is one of the better looking cars on the road today. A very radical step for Nissan. The Aztek was supposed to be radical too, but the execution was all wrong. The Murano has some of the sleekest lines on any vehicle out there today.The FX45 is a beast! The performance of that thing is incredible and the styling is very attention grabbing (in a good way).I voted for the Baja.
Re: which is worse? (cibomatto)
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:17 pm
by JustinVGT
I totally agree that the Aerio is the ugliest! The entire design, especially the rear of the car.
Re: which is worse? (huy397)
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:22 pm
by JustinVGT
I don't mind the Murano much. I like most of the styling except I don't care for the front, mostly the grill. I see many more Muranos here than Vibes, although I've noticed the Vibes are increasing in popularity slightly.
Re: which is worse? (JustinVGT)
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:47 am
by Reynoma
I really find very few vehicles "ugly". The Aztek grew on me. The Baja, once you get past the cladding, isn't too bad. But the Toyota Echo - now that is ugly. Almost Yugo ugly. Way out of proportion, like an elephant on roller skates (I know, the same can be said for the Aztek).
Re: which is worse? (red)
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:44 am
by red
ya know...if they painted all the subie bajas in the silver color, it wouldnt look so tacky....they actually look okay all silver...and the aztek with a little modding looks very neat
Re: which is worse? (cibomatto)
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:45 am
by AKLGT
quote:NONONONO... the UGLIEST... car ever made (IMO) is the Suzuki Aerio i agree! i hate looking at them. i can deal with the funky cladding and hummer/mini morphs, but this.... ugh! it's an eyesore!
Re: which is worse? (trdvibe)
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:22 am
by redlava
Pontiac Vibe (1%, 1 votes)Who was the wise guy that voted for the vibe????
Re: which is worse? (redlava)
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 3:23 am
by red
uh oh...all is not perfect in vibe world
Re: which is worse? (red)
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 3:50 am
by drunkenmaxx
looks like we's gonna have a hangin'