Page 1 of 1
Satellite Tuner vs. FM Modulator
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:47 pm
by shane_c
It seems that most people are going the route of getting satellite radio with the FM modulator. Anyone out there using the satellite tuner and controlling it through a sat. ready deck? I've heard if you do it that way that it's CD quality sound as opposed to FM quality. Is this correct? Do you still need to run an antenna if you do it this way?
Re: Satellite Tuner vs. FM Modulator (shane_c)
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:58 pm
by NSimkins
Quote, originally posted by shane_c »It seems that most people are going the route of getting satellite radio with the FM modulator. Anyone out there using the satellite tuner and controlling it through a sat. ready deck? I've heard if you do it that way that it's CD quality sound as opposed to FM quality. Is this correct? Do you still need to run an antenna if you do it this way? You'll get the best possible sound quality with a satellite-radio ready deck with one of the compatible external "direct connect" tuners. This gives you a solid connection from the tuner straight into the deck itself.Yes, you will still need to run an antenna to the tuner to obtain the signal.My setup includes a Kenwood deck with the Kenwood Sirius Tuner (which I store in one of the side storage areas in the rear hatch). The antenna is run from the back roof and fed through the weatherstripping into the storage area into the tuner. From there, the tuner cable runs to the front of the vehicle into the rear of the Kenwood deck.I have a few pictures of my Kenwood deck itself, here. I don't have any pictures of the tuner or antenna but could take some pics if requested.
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:39 am
by Jahntassa
As said, the satellite radio itself needs it's own antenna to pull the signal from the satellites.You'll get 'near' CD Quality sound, but it'll still sound better than FM Modulation