Page 1 of 1

Honda engines in GM cars?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:16 pm
by Atomb
I was reading an article about the new Honda 4 cyl engines and the design change which will have the crankshaft rotate clockwise as opposed to the counterclockwise on all 4 cyl up to 2005 and i read this paragraph:"If Honda was to supply 4-cyl. engines to another auto maker, as it does with V-6s for General Motors Corp. (all Honda V-6s have been designed from the start to run clockwise), the difficulties in mating the 4-cyl. to many components, chiefly a non-Honda transmission, would make such an arrangement highly problematic."Which Honda V6's are used in GM vehicles??G6? SUV?

Re: Honda engines in GM cars? (Atomb)

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:55 pm
by MACMANIAC
It's the 3.5 v6. I think it is the v6 in the vue, malibu and the base engine in the monte carlo. It is reported to put out 250 horses. Word is G.M. may be shopping around for other engine outsourcing to.

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:18 am
by ragingfish
The Malibu does NOT use a Honda engine. It uses either GM's own ECOTEC 4 cylinder or their 3500 series engines (same as the G6). I believe the VUE is the only car to use the Honda engine.

Re: (ragingfish)

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:58 am
by michaelgt
The Vue is the only vehicle that uses the Honda engine.

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:29 am
by northvibe
ah yes i remember hearing about the vue using a honda engine, yea my moms mailibu has the GM 3500 v6, torqy little thing.

Re: (ragingfish)

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 7:22 am
by ColonelPanic
Quote, originally posted by ragingfish »The Malibu does NOT use a Honda engine. It uses either GM's own ECOTEC 4 cylinder or their 3500 series engines (same as the G6). I believe the VUE is the only car to use the Honda engine.Very correct. Other vehicles on the Vue's platform even, do not share that Honda engine. If the GM 3500 is made by Honda, then Honda has some explainin' to do, damn, that thang's got PUSHRODS and stuff! I thought they were too good for that dinosaur technology! What is GM's curent 3500 has a pretty long history: Started back late 70's/early 80's at least (AFAIK) as the 2.8. Somewhere around '88 or so displacement was bumped up to 3.1L. A significant redesign took place in the mid 90's and the engine was renamed 3100, shortly thereafter displacement was bumped up again and that engine was called the 3400. Finally, displacement was bumped up once again, and we have the 3500 in the G6/Malibu/etc.

Re: (michaelgt)

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 7:43 am
by Flip-Side
Quote, originally posted by michaelgt »The Vue is the only vehicle that uses the Honda engine. Yup, it was a big deal too because it was the first GM vehicle to use another company's engine.

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:06 am
by northvibe
oh and that cvt tranny :S...that didnt last to long.colonelpanic - your telling me. holy crap that engine is a little devil. 200hp 220lbs torq, man that malibu tears around. good thing my mom has it, it its true evil power would be unleashed on this world I actually was looking into getting the base v6 2004 malibu but it was a little more than i wanted to spend. I love the 2004 malibu (not classic or maxx) but the front end...yuck, the rest of the car is amazing. maybe ill buy it from my mom when i sell my dad the vibe. or just get a mazda speed6 ahhhh the choices

Re: (northvibe)

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:24 pm
by Pablo1669
I love my 3.5L thats for sure

Re: (northvibe)

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:35 pm
by ColonelPanic
I had two cars with the 3100 (er, 3.1 in a 90 Cutlass Supreme, and a 3100 in a '98 Malibu.) The Cutlass had 140,000 miles, and I swear that engine was just getting broken in. Loved it. The Malibu wasn't the greatest car, but it would get out there and move even better. Aside from the fact that the car had an appetite for intake gaskets (two in 25,000 miles) and some valve cover gaskets, it was alright. Got 34 MPG on trips too, which can be a challenge in the ol' Vibe.

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:44 pm
by northvibe
My dad said on the last trip they got 36.6 mpg on the 3500 mailibu, now i have to beat that

Re: (northvibe)

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:51 pm
by ragingfish
Quote, originally posted by northvibe »My dad said on the last trip they got 36.6 mpg on the 3500 mailibu, now i have to beat that I'll have to check into the latest figures on the G6...I'm sure it's up there. Gotta love those GM engines...they have balls, but at the same time can be serious fuel misers.

Re: (ragingfish)

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:48 pm
by jeffgtx
to be clear, the first couple years, the VUE did not have a honda engine. our 2003 has a...um i forgot now. but it not the honda. i believe that showed up late 2004 with the intro of the red line and became an option on the v6 model.oh yea, it was a 3.0L

Re: (jeffgtx)

Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:07 pm
by ragingfish
2004 was the first model year to get the Honda 3.5L DOHC V6. It began at the start of that MY.It replaced the GM 3.0L DOHC V6 found in earlier models.

Re: (ColonelPanic)

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:56 pm
by slowvibe
yea my moms got an olds 88 1988 model that flat gets down the road but front wheel drive back then left alot to be desired. someone told my dad that for a couple years in the eighties there was a high output engine in buicks and olds modeled from GM's racing six. Is there any truth to that cause i got that car stashed in a shed and have thought about breaking it down and building a sleeper hotrod.

Re: (Flip-Side)

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 11:03 am
by BuzzDog
Quote, originally posted by Flip-Side »Yup, it was a big deal too because it was the first GM vehicle to use another company's engine.Well, sort of. Our Vibes, and all of their NUMMI-built ancestors ('80's Novas, Prizms, etc.) use Toyota engines, Geo Storms and Trackers ran Suzuki engines (granted, GM has a partial interest), the DOHC Corvettes built about 10 years ago used engines built by Mercury Marine in Oklahoma.The other thing that I find interesting is that the rotation of the engine is an issue. My '63 Corvair's engine rotates counter-clockwise, which is opposite of all other GM cars of the era.

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 11:29 am
by tnpartsguy
Mercury Marine, which was/is a subsidary of GM, NOT FORD, btw.....The 1986.5 Celica GTS used a Yamaha designed and built engine (just a little trivia for ya) which lost 25+ HP the next year when Toyota took over production.

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 4:50 pm
by northvibe
yamaha has/had some sweet engines. they made the engines for my fav. car the Taurus SHO, 3.0 v6, 3.2 v6 and a 3.4 v8.

Re: (northvibe)

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:55 pm
by ColonelPanic
Those SHO's were pretty mean beasts!

Re: (tnpartsguy)

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:40 pm
by BuzzDog
Quote, originally posted by tnpartsguy »Mercury Marine, which was/is a subsidary of GM, NOT FORD, btw...Correct...didn't mean to imply that Mercury Marine was in any way related to THAT "Mercury."BTW, GM is just a supplier for Mercury Marine (although a REALLY big one), which has been owned by Brunswick since 1960.

Re: (BuzzDog)

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:58 am
by cohocarl
Quote, originally posted by BuzzDog » the DOHC Corvettes built about 10 years ago used engines built by Mercury Marine in Oklahoma.That would be the LT5 engine which was designed by Lotus (I believe) and was in 1990-1995 ZR-1 Corvettes.

Attached files

Re: (cohocarl)

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:41 pm
by binary
Quote, originally posted by cohocarl »That would be the LT5 engine which was designed by Lotus (I believe) and was in 1990-1995 ZR-1 Corvettes. Correct - it's the otherway around - Merc used the LT[#] engines in their boats - only they removed a lot of emissions and really made those powerplants scream.